更多
2016-05-24
9922 瀏覽
Yakiniku Great is a Japanese barbecue chain that's recently opened on Queen's Road. According to their website, the restaurant's concept is:"under construction under constructionunder constructionunder constructionunder constructionunder constructionunder..."It keeps going in that vein. Anyway, I have some meat-loving friends who are into tabletop barbecue, so we all went out to give this place a try.While they grabbed our beers and before they explained the menu to us (which they were adamant a
"under construction under constructionunder constructionunder constructionunder constructionunder constructionunder..."
It keeps going in that vein. Anyway, I have some meat-loving friends who are into tabletop barbecue, so we all went out to give this place a try.
Omakase Take: "Omakase Special Rare 7 Cuts." $430 per person.
Omakase Matsu: "Omakase Premium Special Rare 7 Cuts." $620 per person. ""MATSU" will be include "chateau briand", "misuji", and "Kimura Yaki"." I definitely recommend this as the chateau briand and the kimura yaki were my favorites of the evening.
The kimuchi is fine, but far from a Korean kimchi. I don't believe it was fermented: the cabbage was fresh and crisp. I think they just rubbed it with gochujang. Still, it was fine, I did eat it, and veggies are good for you.
Upper left: Chateau Briand (5 seconds, both sides, add wasabi and soy). "Superior rare cut from centre part of fillet! Thick cut with finest strips of fat. The soft and pleasantly firm texture is highly enjoyable."
The most expensive thing on the menu is the Chateau Briand Steak (not what we got). It's "Reservation Only." I don't understand how their reservation system is supposed to work. While they do have a website, it only has the regular menu, which does not contain any of the things that need to be reserved. How are people supposed to know?
I will say that the hype for this one is not ridiculous. The chateau briand was my favorite piece of meat at the meal. It's the second-priciest thing, after the chateau briand steak, but I recommend that you shell out for it.
Upper right: Kuri (2 seconds, each side). "Fully trimmed lean meat." As the description suggests, this was pretty basic.
Left: Dai Sankaku with Tare (3 seconds, each side). "The most popular part and sold out everyday in Japan. Creamy and tender texture, just like a silk on your tongue!"
How can they both be the most popular? The opinion at the table was actually that both pieces of meat were realatively bland, and especially so for the misuji. I'm not disputing Japanese tastes (de gustibus and all that), but there are more exciting things on the menu.
Left: Shakushi (Here there was a discrepancy. The instructions we were given, and the sign we were given said "2 seconds, each side" whereas the menu says "5 seconds one side!" We went with the verbal instructions). "Tastes like melting! Rarely taken around shoulder."
I was having trouble remembering anything about this one, so to jog my memory I googled "shakushi"-- the results contained an anime character, a Mt. Shakushi, and spatulas. So I'm not entirely convinced this is an actual cut of meat.
This was definitely a hit. It was the second favorite of two of us (me included, after the chateau briand) and the favorite of two of us. And normally I'm kind of turned off by raw eggs.
At this point in the meal, I've eaten so much meat that my meat memories start to blend together. I know we in general liked the lean stuff and the thin stuff, and this being lean and thin suggests to me that we liked it. But it's a touchy inference.
It's odd to say X doesn't taste worse than Y. While literally it's a compliment (it means X is as good or better than Y), negative gradable adjectives like 'bad' or 'stupid' have an implication, even when used comparatively. If I say, "Nathan is stupider than Liz," this is technically true if Nathan and Liz are both super smart, but Nathan a tiny bit less so. However, it implies that both are stupid. Similarly, if you say the misuji briand is not worse than the chateau briand, you imply that both are bad. Just sayin, translation is hard!
Looking over the meal as a whole, here are some reflections. First, it was expensive. We paid $800 a head for the above and 6 draft beers. Now for most people who go to expensive places, high price is a feature and not a bug. You signal your wealth by dressing nicely and eating at high concept ("under construction under constructionunder...") places that cost lots of money.
But that's not me. I'm a schlub. I wore a Spider-Man t-shirt and jeans with holes in them to the restaurant. Not the fancy jeans where the sweatshop kid in Bangladesh makes you jeans with holes in them and you buy them at some trendy Central shop where shirtless male models stand around: I just need new clothes. I'm not at restaurants to eat wagyu per se, I'm there for good food, be it cheap or expensive, high concept or Hooters.
And in the end, this place isn't that much better than a regular Korean bbq joint. Asking myself the tried-and-true question: would I go back? I find that my answer is: "Well, there are a couple of things I really liked, but I really like bulgogi too." I understand why this place costs a lot: it's a nice space, the staff are plentiful and attentive, and the meat is special and imported. But what that adds to the experience *in my mouth* is marginal. I wouldn't go back.
That's not to say I regret having gone. It was interesting comparing the different textures of the different parts of the cow side by side. It was interesting to just see what fancy tabletop bbq amounts to. But I'm not interested in doing it again.
After we finished our meal, we went to La Creperie for dessert, because people were still hungry.
張貼