I actually previously wrote a long review on this, but my computer crashed and I lost the info. So bear with me if this is a bit too simplified on a 2nd attempt!
Sometimes I genuinely feel that us locals should not 'reject' the inaugural HK Michelin publication so much, afterall, it has barely had the benefit of less than a year since its publication. Should it has it fair share of errors and disagreements with what might recommend otherwise. On the other hand? My biggest fear is that due to some egotistical reasons or what other excuses, that certain local shops with really high quality executions of traditionaly Cantonese food might escape their attention for the 2nd time around, if they refuse to listen to the ordinary folks. Although I shall also stress that - those of us who are adamant that 'foreigners' wouldn't be able to understand Chinese food perfectly, would only make us seem like ostriches pointing their behinds upwards toward the sky all day long. I have certainly seen numerous 'foreign food critics' whose knowledge of Chinese and also Cantonese food to be so profound and accurate, it surprised me that they even understood the chinese words meanings and nuaces and how its cooked. Let's not kid ourselves and think our Chinese souls are 刀槍不入 and allow a shameful history to repeat itself in the process. As much as we might understand French or British food, let's not assume that's wouldn't be the case vice versa.
9.5/10 金錢雞 - If the Manor's version is the modernised healthy version, I think the Tak Lung's version can only be described as an 'Idealized' version, according to the wish of the chef and owner. From my memory bank, 金錢雞 in the past did not taste like this at all. It used to carry a lot more livery taste, the fat was chewy and yellow, the pork portion was ultra lean. The version here is slightly modernised but its just divine. The fatty layer might not carry as much rose wine scent as the Manor version, but it made up for it with its much more sophisticated malty-glaze and sauce.
8.5/10 台山焗蟹缽 - Although 奄仔蟹 isn't considered a delicacy as such and is normally used in cheap congees or hotpots, I thought the porcelain baked crab dish here was just amazingly executed. The crabs' organs from roes to the greenish tomalley was melted right onto the baked egg dish in an oily way. The combination of taro bits as well as chinese black olives (欖角) really accentuated the dish to another level in terms of sophistication, the olives especially having an aroma that reminds me of a meaty summer truffle.
6.5/10 雞蛋焗魚腸 - Due to the standard set by the previous dish and with me being the agent provocateur, we ordered this as a follow-up and had high expectations. I must say we were slightly disappointed, as this is nowhere near the best versions of the same dish I've had in the past and certainly can't compare to the West Villa version I encountered not so long ago. Here, it actually carries a bit of salty pork and what seemed like Westernised smoked ham rather than Yunnan ham. It mainly lacked the fish liver's oily taste which gives it the profound aroma, and the fish intestines were too thoroughly cleaned and soaked to give it any real character.
With the use of Cilantro stalks rather than also using more of the leafy parts of the same plant, it carried more of an aniseed flavour but lacked the aroma that could be possible if the leaves were imparted into the baked dish. Yes, this dish smells nice and eggy, but it was a bit soul-less without the main theme ingredient protruding and showing through beyond its mere presence. It might as well be as a filler - which this dish also doesn't have any chinese crullers. Left a lot to be desired and I don't recommend this.
8.0/10 失傳古法太爺雞 - This is known to be a rare dish with an ancient recipe that has been lost through the years. It actually uses 龍崗雞, a highly treasured Cantonese chicken known for its chicken flavour but with a leaner and slightly tougher meat despite its large physical size. Smoked with aged pur erh, rice grains and cane sugar, I thought the chicken itself was cooked perfectly and it was quite tender without being artificially so. The chicken taste was detectable but it got a bit covered by the smoked-sugar. In fact, the cane sugar influence also covered the non-existent chinese tea smoke which I came to expect. Fortunately, this came with a very adequate shallots based sauce which surprisingly, complemented the chicken very well. I liked this but I guess I though the skin was too sweet in a sense.
8.0/10 山楂咕嚕肉 - This is the famed southern Cantonese interpretation of the same dish also served in Northern China (which uses darker soy and vinegar based sauce) and adorns every table within sight this night, some people even opting for an upsized portion. This was quite nice indeed, the Hawthorn Sauce was definitely the real deal as its jammy and my nose could not pick up any vinegar whatsoever, which I'm highly allergic to as it makes my eyes water if I happen to smell it.
The batter was slightly too thick in my opinion but it served to retain its crunchiness even after the addition of the sauce, which 'hung' onto the bite sized meats and now I finally understand why this part is raved about, as its probably quite difficult to achieve consistently. I actually thought, truth be told, that the sauce could do with a stronger Hawthorn berry flavour - as it is now, it was a bit confectionery especially when it also carried a bit of cane sugar taste in the background. I liked how this came with fresh pineapples, green capsicums as well as bit of Hawthorn jellies on the side. This is very good indeed, although I do remember having better in Canton/Guangzhou a few times.
7.5/10 鴨腳包 - This consists of taro, duck feet (bone-in), taro, lard and bbq char siu, tied around itself with a long piece of duck intesting. Apparently, this duck intestine must be 1 singular stringy piece or else the whole thing would collapse when it shrinks under cooking. I've actually never had this before but when I asked my parents, they said that they used to buy this all the time, sometimes even carried it into cinemas like it duck gizzards or pop-corn.
It was 'interesting', and the execution was actually quite good. I'm just thinking if this could have benefitted more if it used duck meat rather than pork, to stick with its core theme.
7.0/10 蝦籽柚皮 - This polarised the table but we found out why. 1 piece of the pomelo skin (now nearly in season or close enough!) was much more tastier than the other thicker piece, because it managed to soak up more juice. To me, I've always loved this dish since a kid despite not having it for many years and I think there can be 2 approaches to how to cook this dish. One is when a lot of fish stock is used to poach the 'skins' and it infiltrates deeply into the fibres. The other is when the original citrusy taste can remain slightly intact, provided the bitterness is eliminated. I thought that the version here lied somewhere in between. The stock it was cooked in was slightly single dimensional, although the shrimp roe sauce made up with its unique umami taste. I also think the texture of the skins was slightly too soft..... The version I had at Manor was at least 2 notches above the version here though.
8.8/10 紅豆沙 - This carried a fresher fruit zest flavour other than the older, aged zest influence. It was good as it is, as it was refreshening. It even managed to have a slightly gritty texture that dessert soup lovers desire, with perfectly cooked lotus seeds that were half way between crunchy and soft.
9.5/10 桂花糕 - I really liked this. It carried a lot of Osmanthus flower taste without the associated sourness, also the ripe goji berries gave it just that extra dimension. Perhaps what really surprised me is how the jelly base itself also carried a strong fruity flavour and it wasn't overly 'hard' like many other places, the osmanthus flower buds within also being quite aromatic. I went to Lung King Heen again right after this meal and the 'jelly' here surprisingly puts that into oblivion, but that's another story and review when I get around to it!
********************************** Although this meal certainly was not flawless, I would also like to point out that not one single or multiple Michelin starred restaurant I have visited locally didn't suffer the same fate. It was highly satisfying in so many ways and I think it carried a lot of sophistication than it should - one could envisage that a lot of effort was actually put in to certain dishes this night, which gave it just that much more of an extra dimension that one could bargain for for the ridiculously affordable prices.
This is a gem of Hong Kong for certain and if I was a tourist from up north or from a Western country and relied solely on the 2009 1st edition of the HK Michelin Redbook, I would certainly have missed one very satisfying dining experience.
Some foods = '4-5' Some foods = '3' But in general, I think its edging enough close to a '5' or a very high '4'
YK Fat
共98篇食評
四十載的美味*得龍飯店
為免人多,未到五時半便已抵達新蒲崗,先將車泊好便到『得龍飯店』.......
店內陳設老舊,牆上貼著"米芝蓮"海報,被評為價錢合理而美味餐廳......
菜牌只是A4紙一張,詳列了各款鎮店名菜,還有☆數目代表受歡迎指數呢......
第一度菜是「2007食神爭霸戰冠軍名菜」砵酒焗桶蠔 ($178),熱騰騰上枱,但賣相一般!而價錢遍高
今個週末剛巧要到九龍東做 Market Visit,便順道到新蒲崗碰碰運氣,看看能否有緣找個位子,一嚐著名的懷舊小菜......
為免人多,未到五時半便已抵達新蒲崗,先將車泊好便到『得龍飯店』。
可能時間尚早,毋需等位....
店內陳設老舊,牆上貼著"米芝蓮"海報,被評為價錢合理而美味餐廳......
菜牌只是A4紙一張,詳列了各款鎮店名菜,還有☆數目代表受歡迎指數呢......
兩枝公點了三度菜;餐前小食 ($14) 是冰鎮鹵水鵝掌及千層耳,味度確實不差,少許的麻油香沒有蓋過鹵水的鮮味,少少的幾件便能食出師傅是絕不馬虎....
第一度菜是「2007食神爭霸戰冠軍名菜」砵酒焗桶蠔 ($178),熱騰騰上枱,味度尚有接受,但賣相一般!而價錢遍高,雙比同樣做得出色的「西苑」的 薑葱焗美國石蠔煲 $138 及 「大榮華」的 橄油焗金蠔 $88,「得龍」賣的確非物超所值呢.....
跟著是 山揸咕嚕肉 ($88),脆漿做得非常好,入口脆脆的,酸甜度恰到好處......
最後是另一鎮店撚手名菜 「2005食神爭霸戰冠軍名菜」失傳古法太爺雞 ($128半隻),濃列的煙燻味加上雞的肉香,果然一試難忘。如能在賣相做好些就十全十美....
飯後並送上 紅豆沙 及 杞子紅棗桂花凍糕,都是水準之作......
全店不收加一,這晚兩人消費共 $440,整體食物質數都好有水準,但環境衛生及樓面服務尚有改善空間,加上部份菜式都略為 Mark-up 過高 (可能名氣大吧!),如要一試都無妨........
評分: 味道 4 環境 2 服務 2 衛生 2 抵食 3
0個
查看結果
ciaogatto
共14篇食評
第二次嚟..
原籠金蒜糯米蝦
焗西米布甸
先來金$鷄及鴨腳包, 這兩味做appetizer好正
有一次聽到人哋話金$鷄最好是成個sandwich組合咁食, 就要follow呢個食法!
最值得一提的是, 那塊傳說中浸過玫瑰露酒嘅肥豬肉, 食落一D都唔覺油膩, 而且有爽口嘅感覺
我記得第一次來得龍食飯亦有點這味, 當時因為驚肥, 就挑走呢舊肥豬肉, 當場俾人鬧...
真係抵鬧
鴨腳包呢, 重點不在味道, 而是睇佢點樣將D材料卷成咁樣!
我唔知是否需要成個組合食, 但真係有點難度, 所以要先解體(燒肉, 火腿, 芋頭.. 最後鴨腳)
籠仔糯米蒸蝦: 覺得呢個麻麻地, 糯米蒸得太腍, 冇咗米粒嘅口感
魚湯蝦乾浸津白: 算是當晚最"健康"嘅一度菜. 好鍾意個奶白色嘅湯... 當所有人夾晒第一round之後, 我要晒D湯嚟飲
佛跳牆: 上次也有order, 好似嚟呢度必食, 湯嘅味道相信好多人喺呢道講過, 最大發現係佢嘅湯渣/竹絲鷄, 雖然已作煲湯料, 但鷄肉竟然唔鞋, 成隻竹絲鷄就係咁點豉油食晒
太爺鷄: 今次又翻炒呢味菜(其實我想試吓其他鷄款, "燻"嘅食物不是我杯茶, 但小數服從多數), 半隻份量不多, 我覺得上次隻鷄滑D, 但味道冇變!
脆奶拼釀鳳翼: 脆奶很好, 剛炸好就出來, 熱到不能即時幹掉(咬開炸粉D奶熱到出煙!!), 微甜有少少奶香, 但炸粉略嫌厚; 鳳翼就認真麻麻地, 入面釀的, 我以為糯米, 不過唔係, 係D綠色嘅菜蓉, 有D怪怪地...
最後, 由於上次來望到隔離枱叫焗西米布甸, 好恨食但又食唔到, 所以今次我話一定要叫: 味道不太甜/標準, 但焗得唔夠燶香, 再焗多一點時間就好.
其實.. 由於呢到出名D嘢食偏肥膩, 嚟到呢到已好飽! 佢仲送桂花糕+海帶綠豆沙, 最後半份布甸及桂花糕要用盒攞走.
評分: 味道 4 環境 2 服務 3 衛生 2 抵食 3
3個
共有2 人投票
查看結果
共2篇食評
問極都唔答仲有幾多張枱 (好過份)
呢間算係新蒲崗較為有名氣的飯店. 食物都算中上的. 不過美中不足係處理等候客人的態度十分惡劣.
是日只有套餐供應, 食物都大大碟, 份量十足, 只係有個無骨雞翼略為鹹左 d, 但入面係菜碎, 感覺都幾特別. 同埋大大個炸鮮奶就甜左 d. 不過條石斑很大條, 味道很鮮甜. 仲有個芝士龍蝦伊麵都好皇芝士味, 又多伊麵, 龍蝦都好大隻, 啖啖肉. 仲有成隻煙熏雞都大大隻, 又新鮮!!! 但個翅就較為遜色. 最尾有個用點心籠黎裝糯米飯同紅豆沙, 但味道一般.
不過我就唔係好滿意負責 book 枱既阿姐 (四眼的), 十問九唔答我地仲要等幾耐 / 仲要等幾多張枱. 我成家屋企都係街出面等左成半個鐘, 期間都入去問左 4-5 次仲要等幾耐, 但佢地只會叫我地繼續等, 唔肯答仲要等幾多張枱. 我地覺得有無搞錯呀!! 如果係有排等都講聲, 我地會轉去其他飯店食, o個度唔係得佢一間飯店的. 做到個款唔憂做咁, 好巴閉咩!!! 下次都唔會再去光顧.
好彩, 老闆咁o岩係門口, 聽到我地不滿, 即刻 order 伙計去跟我地既 booking, 好快就有枱比我地, d 態度仲好好 tim, 不愧為係老闆!! o個 d 門口員工真係可以炒.
評分: 味道 3 環境 1 服務 1 衛生 1 抵食 2
0個
共有1 人投票
查看結果
里奧
共658篇食評
金錢雞重陽鵝
是晚其實重點兩個菜式,金錢雞及荔芋炆鵝,得龍老店果然名不虛傳,金錢雞的鳳肝冰肉叉燒粘上蜜糖燒制,甘香美味,可惜欠碗白飯;荔芋炆鵝雖然重陽鵝炆得過腍,但仍不失鵝肉獨有的香味,加上鵝膏的滋潤,明白為什麼為不時不食。
另外同場加影的炒花蛤,肥大肉厚,花數分鍾已經干掉,可想捧場客的反應就知這花蛤的美味;咕嚕肉,比起得龍鮮山楂生炒骨不煌多讓;另外的滷水雞雜,雖然偏鹹,但嚐到久遺的雞雜甘膩,膽固醇,由他吧!
評分: 味道 4 環境 4 服務 4 衛生 4 抵食 5
1個
共有3 人投票
查看結果
西門町大惡男
共1488篇食評
《得龍.彌久常新的重陽鵝盛宴》~宴席上篇
野雞卷不能炸定,回油後的雞卷,難吃死了。
睡著的時候,卻被滋擾聲音吵醒,揉著眼,要起來看真點這世界。
先來一篇懷舊食評,說的是十月得龍的盛宴,一行人回味古法金錢雞之餘,亦試試曾生花上大量時間與心血替眾人製作的古法金錢鱔。
彌久,持之而行的味道,難
常新,基礎而作的改進,難
盛宴,雋永佳菜覓知音,更難
彌久的三層冰肉金錢雞,仍值得我們繼續支持,常新而勇於蛻變的豬網油金錢鱔,我們亦期待它的古法風味能閃耀光芒,一行五十六人,迎重陽鵝佳期,新知舊雨聚於得龍,一嚐鵝香與及不能忘的老香江味道。
新知舊雨一行五十六人共聚一起,新知對金錢雞、野雞卷及重陽鵝抱著期待,而舊雨既能重溫古法味道,亦可嚐到在網油腰肝卷基礎上,演進出的金錢鱔,是夜菜式很「老派」,故金錢雞,亦改作自選項目,讓食友量力而為,結果是五十六人點選了五十九件得龍鎮店名菜,而食友James及Danny更是每人連下兩城,做得好的古法菜,是值得追捧的。
今天的金錢雞,修剪得工整一致,既悅目亦整齊得體,席間略述金錢雞的做法及冰肉、鳳肝及叉燒等三大原材料是決定味道主要元素。
是夜菌湯材料很足,帶著濃濃的螺頭味,老雞也下得不少,也反映了老闆曾生的好客之道。
野雞卷,每席十四件分量是足夠有餘,沒下醬油調味才會如此金黃精緻,冰肉炸得乾爽,豐腴不膩,亦沒有半點脂肪羶雜味,處理得很好。
古法菜金錢鱔,質感既鬆亦嚐到黃鱔應有的彈性,豬網油除豐富了油潤感外,亦鎖著黃鱔及肉餡的肉汁,如此複雜的包紮、釀炸菜式清爽不油,是處理得好的佳菜。(由於是新菜式,朋友們想吃的話,請致電預訂及查詢價錢)
嚐了一些風味佳菜,以涼伴梅粉涼瓜消消膩亦不錯,涼瓜清爽甘甜,很可口。
宴席還未完的,主角重陽鵝將於宴席下篇分享。
搵食艱難,收工與眾食友簡單的吃餐好,現今仍堅持採用肥肉做金錢的店子賣少見少,希望能做回自己味的古法金錢雞,能被現世代的後輩所尊重,最起碼不要將珍貴味道拿來當玩笑,讓它保存一點真,可以嗎?
更詳盡的廚.宴故事分享請到:
http://foodxfile.blogspot.com/2009/10/blog-post_28.html
評分: 味道 5 環境 3 服務 5 衛生 3 抵食 5
3個
共有9 人投票
查看結果
snap-write
共77篇食評
無悔的古法金錢雞
《2010年米芝蓮指南 香港 澳門》版塵埃落定,添好運莫名其妙獲贈一星,大家仍對她的評選機制議論紛紛,是耶是非我沒資格評論,然而,今年兩間三星當中包括了龍景軒,而[八間二星餐廳[中粵菜館佔上了五間,三十二間一星米芝蓮中,有二十一間是粵菜/廣東菜館,單是粵菜部分已佔整體比例一半以上,粵菜受到飲食聖經的認同,非壞事。
更叫人鼓舞的是,半世紀歷史的得龍,憑著老闆曾生的努力,其金錢雞亦被西方所認同,入選今年的「必彼登」推介,對於捍衛古法之士,實是鼓舞,這篇封存已久的文章,今天也是時候拿出來,述說得龍由1950s四和菜走到今天,將冰肉金錢雞、大良野雞卷、古法太爺雞及古法金錢鱔重現的老香江故事。
「說金錢雞故事,我欣賞老一輩處理及善用材料的心,在戰後物資貧乏年代,將下欄物資都收集下來,如宰雞後棄掉的雞肝,肉檔賣剩肥豬肉及乾巴巴沒半點脂肪的瘦 肉,重新組合成三層式的吊燒金錢雞,取冰肉油脂豐潤瘦肉乏脂肪的先天不足問題,雞肝蛋白質豐富,燒後濃郁甘腴,三者加起來見證了老香江愛飲食、對食材珍而 重之的心。
出道初天真地以為金錢雞純粹是一件手工菜,只要肯花四~六天把肥肉醃製成雪白冰肉,以玫瑰露替鳳肝調味,與及把叉燒燒好,願花功夫誰也做得好。及後嚐過益新、蓮香樓及富瑤,再回想得龍味道,也就多了點體會,若沒有老街坊的口味鞏固老派粵菜味道,金錢雞味道一但走樣,可預期的是銷量將減,而導致如坊間酒家般要「預訂」,偶爾的訂單,燒味師傅豈會有心把菜做好?今天的金錢雞銷量雖列為本地最高,每日能賣出近八十件,每件賣$19,生意額佔不到每晚收入十分之一,老闆曾生卻不將之除牌,集中火力在海鮮等賺錢項目,真是香江傳奇。」
這幾年來,我們不時來打搞得龍的曾生,每次來也會吃出色的金錢雞,得龍沒有因時代轉變而被淘汰,每時在改變的認真態度,令她闖出一片天來,或許認有人不懂珍惜傳統文化,拿著古法大過天來攻擊,然而今天我仍沒後悔當日以有限的「殘樣,拿住串金錢雞,力撐得龍是心目中的米芝蓮」,懂尊重食物的菜館,是值得繼續支持的,得龍的全體員工,請繼續努力,期待你們來年會有更佳的表現!
更多得龍大飯店的發展史及菜式故事分享,請參閱:
《由古法金錢雞開始》
http://foodxfile.blogspot.com/2009/09/lolo.html
評分: 味道 5 環境 3 服務 5 衛生 3 抵食 5
3個
共有11 人投票
查看結果
唔食都知唔好食
共690篇食評
蝗蟲大鬥金錢雞
是夜德龍之宴菜式豐富,食友的酒水也多
甜品是麥米粥及杞子桂花糕,但也是普通貨色
有幸參與此飯局,在此也先多謝惡男兄的悉心安排,今夜的飯局在本人渴望已久的得龍吃傳統的廣府菜,很早前已經想一吃它的金錢雞,今天也是有幸一嚐,其實在很多年前也來過吃晚飯,但可能以前的我確是乳臭未乾,不懂吃它的金錢雞,但印象中其中式小炒已經是令大家津津樂道,更何況是今回的大局。
也只是剛準時來到,也來先看看精美的菜單,發覺今晚總共有十三道菜,比以往的大局小了,惡男兄及KC兄解說這是因為以往是吃剩得太多了,倒不如減少一點份量,又可收符便宜一點,何樂而不為,但說是減少了,但其實也有六款小吃、一款湯品、六款主菜、一個單尾及兩項甜點。
六款的小吃分別置以三碟上桌,分別是古法金錢雞伴山楂涼瓜條、滷雞雜及一個大拼盤,拼盤內除了有傳統的大良野雞卷及古法金錢鱔外,更有據惡男兄所說由店家私伙送贈的意大利肉腸;是晚的湯品是雲南野菌湯;然後六款的主菜是麒麟蝦籽柚皮、咕嚕肉、煙燻太爺雞、金不換炒花蛤、家鄉芋頭鵝砵及魚湯浸皇帝菜;單尾來一客芝士蟹肉烏冬麵,再以麥米粥及杞子桂花糕作結,也應該會很夠吃的了。
先來是一道叫大家也十分期待的金錢雞,雖然是夜被放置在自選的項目,但似乎大家對此味古法菜的熱情,是非常之狂熱的,只有人叫多,沒有人叫少,所以似乎放在自選項目也是最好不過,想吃的吃多一點,而採用用者自付的原則,非常公平,也談回是夜的金錢雞,也採用了懷舊吊燒的方式,之前吃過了蓮香居的金錢雞,個人認為已經算是很不錯的了,可是今天一吃得龍的,高下立見。
當然,此處的金錢雞也是由冰肉、鳳肝及叉燒疊合而成,在表面放上小片子薑,此子薑效力驚人,平衡了冰肉及鳳肝的油膩感,雖然整體吃起來不太有酒香,但冰肉勝在豐腴美味,咬下時在口腔中油脂爆發,感覺很棒,明明是脂肪來的,但吃起來就沒有吃脂肪的感覺,鳳肝軟滑而充滿濃濃的膶香,而叉燒肉不嚡而蜜味香濃,邊位更是焦黑了變炭,是我最愛的叉燒,三者合為一體,是美味得令人難以忘記的快感,但由於為了健康着想,是夜也只是點了一件,吃過了便算。
吃過了甘香豐膩的金錢雞,店家非常細心的為我們準備了山楂涼瓜條,吃起來清涼甘美,山渣粉的味道緩緩釋出,酸酸甜甜的,平衡了剛才金錢雞在口中殘餘的油份,讓大家的味蕾重新出發。
之後來的是一碟小小的滷雞雜,為何會用小小來形容呢?因為碟雞雜在上桌後十五秒內消失於無形,雞雜有雞腎、雞膶及雞腸,雞腎又凍又爽口,滲滿了滷水香,滷水不死鹹,吃起來當然好吃;雞膶更妙,吃起來粉嫩幼滑,吃起來一點粗糙感也沒有,滷水香跟雞膶的膶香配合得很好,吃起來沒有一絲膩滯之感,只有強勁的膶香;雞腸爽口非常,但就不夠肥美,加上腸很吸汁,吃起來就過鹹了一點,但也尚算好味。好味的東西永遠也嫌少,這碟雞雜份量真的太小嗎?不,隔桌竟然是吃不光的,最後由我們清碟。
之後喝口湯來作一個間場,是雲南的野菌湯,真的是雲南嗎?菌是。但個人認為湯喝起來不太像,湯頭用上了雞殼、雞腳、豬展及螺頭來煲,會不甜嗎?就是這樣濃甜的燉湯,就是廣東人的風格,跟雲南湯品輕輕帶天然菇香的風格是截然不同的,除了以上的材料,湯也有棕菌、其他菌類、翅郡及竹生等來煲,菌吃起來爽口的爽口,煙韌的煙韌,竹生條條肥大爽口,加上甜甜的湯,真的是好喝極了。
接下來的是手工繁複的工夫小吃,以拼盤形式出現,拼有金錢鱔、野雞卷及法國腸。頭兩項也是傳統的廣府菜,來多的一個法國腸,聽惡男兄說是老闆的特別禮物,法國腸吃起來沒什麼特別,吃起來又鹹香甘美,下酒一流;野雞卷真的是超棒,豬背脊的肥肉醃過後,卷成小盒子的卷狀蘸薄粉再炸,炸得非常透切,吃起來是外層酥香,內層豬肉的豐腴感十足,是棒得無話可說的一道,做得比鳳城的要好;金錢鱔用了豬網油,將鱔肉及其他的豬肉餡包起再炸,鱔肉不夠肥美有咬口,豬肉餡也不太香,比較喜歡的是在肉餡之中有少量的馬蹄,在大量的肉之中,找到了一點平衡,另外也非常喜歡那層豬網油,炸過後果然是肥美甘香,為肉餡挽回了不少分數。
然後來到小菜的環節了,先吃的是麒麟蝦籽柚皮,切成小塊的柚皮方便大家夾,每塊柚皮上有一片金華火腿及冬菇,淋上內有大量蝦籽的茨汁,柚皮吃起來細嫩沒渣,吃起來一點酸苦澀味也沒有,扣上的茨汁也有很香火腿味,縱使蝦籽味不太強,但絕對可說是又一水準之作。
此處的咕嚕肉的特式就是其咕嚕汁加入點山楂,所以又會叫山楂咕嚕肉,坦白說,本人吃不到任何的山楂味,真的是一點也沒有,味道也是酸酸甜甜的,酸味很自然,一點死酸的感覺也沒有,而咕嚕汁真的全扣上在肉塊上,看其碟底真的想找多滴汁也難,師傅炒功一流,加上咕嚕肉咬起來很脆口,內層的肉一點也不嚡韌,更還有不少的豬肉香,這咕嚕肉,真的是簡單的極品。
得龍的另一名物,煙燻太爺雞一隻散叫好像要二百多元一隻,雞應該是滷過了再燻的,吃起來很有茶燻味,也另外帶點酒香、茶葉香、八角陳皮味,味道異常複雜,但又是非常好吃,可能在其滷水膽內,加入了適當的有上八角陳皮及玫瑰露吧,而雞肉的雞味已被濃郁的滷水的及茶葉香蓋過了,始乎這也很合現時的大潮流,就是新鮮雞難求,索性不做切雞,改成燻雞,所以那燻過滷過的雞皮很是好吃,而其雞肉又嫩滑剛熟,師傅功力之深,不言而喻。
然後送來的是一客金不換炒花蛤,看上去不太像炒花蛤,反較像用汁焗煮,更奇妙的是說是用上了金不換來炒,但吃起來又不太像金不換的香味,但又不知怎樣去形容它,是怪味花蛤嗎?怎說也好,平心而論,花甲巨形厚肉,無沙肥美,材料方面是很不錯的,所以如果用上油鹽水煮,會否更好吃呢?
之後就是是夜的主角,乃家鄉芋頭鵝砵,真的非常大砵,始乎今次我們有大考驗了,此鵝聽惡男兄說,是原隻炆煮的鵝,每件也是切得大大件的排得整整齊齊,在鵝煲面頭撒上一點有香茅味的蔥,再煲底是大量的芋頭,用上南乳汁炆煮的重陽鵝,味道濃郁滿有南乳香,吃起來還有點鵝味,鵝肉下的脂肪頗多,吃起來肥美好吃,而下面的芋頭很大塊,但每一塊也是既粉且香,所以吃着吃着,我們最後還是可以整煲吃個清光。
最後來一道纖維作結,魚湯浸皇帝菜的魚湯鹹了一點,喝起來一點也不像是上湯來的,幸好皇帝菜夠嫩口,吃起來又沒有渣,不錯,但在其面頭的元貝及蝦乾始乎作用不大。
單尾不是廣府的美食,而是非西非日的芝士蟹肉烏冬麵,店家說烏冬是日本師傅手打的,蟹肉是亞拉斯加蟹,而芝士是意大利來貨的。對不起!本人不太相信以上的說話,芝士吃起來根本只不過是白汁而已,吃起來偏鹹,芝士味很薄,相信只不過用了點芝士粉而已,而蟹肉一點鮮味也沒有,但不是用上蟹柳已是萬幸,烏冬麵更是軟腍腍沒咬口的,日本師傅手打?沒可能吧。這杰身白汁的烏冬麵,用來飽肚倒真的是很稱職的。
最後店家奉上麥米粥及杞子桂花糕作結,麥米粥甜度高了一點,麥米也是硬了一點;杞子桂花糕不錯,雖然偏甜,但糕身夠彈性而不硬身,吃起來挺有桂花香,所以也吃了三件才罷休,當然是沒法跟添好運的比。
也許是夜的菜式實在是太美妙,也許就是攪手的心思,我們這一枱真的是吃清每一道菜,但坦白說,吃過了甜點後,也不可能再放下東西入肚了,所以是夜菜式的數量及份量也是剛好,而其實除了上述兩個也許之外,第三個也許就是我們這一枱的蝗蟲指數是嚴重超標,才會如此,因為其餘枱的食物是全吃不光的,只有我們就是這樣,但就是這樣,就吃得高興盡興,在此再次多謝惡男兄及KC兄的邀請。
評分: 味道 5 環境 3 服務 4 衛生 3 抵食 5
3個
共有2 人投票
查看結果
小勁健
共213篇食評
還是晚飯好
「馬拉糕」
「燒賣」
「蝦餃」
「南瓜排骨飯」
馬拉糕的甜味不重,尚算彈牙,論味道只屬不過不失。燒賣內的肥瘦肉平均,豬肉味濃,吃得過。反而類近的蝦餃則水準一般,尤其是餡料不夠豐富,沒有一般的蝦餃味道,反而感覺怪怪的。
最後再來一盅南瓜排骨飯,排骨夠肥美,肉味濃,南瓜腍之餘亦吸收了排骨的肉汁,吃下時特別甘香。飯粒夠軟,上層的排骨南瓜味再多一點豉油,已十分醒神。
數款點心整體上的質素只屬一般,還是晚飯來得精彩百倍。
評分: 味道 3 環境 3 服務 3 衛生 2 抵食 3
1個
共有2 人投票
查看結果
sosoku
共314篇食評
未窺全豹
四十多年的老店
飯巿過後,回復平靜
燒味檔已貼了「是日訂滿金錢雞和鴨腳包」的紅紙
這天打算到慈雲山與長輩飲茶,但途經新蒲崗,想起「得龍」,因心繫此店美食已久,擇日不如撞日,倒不如改往得龍午膳,接過兩老後,打的往得龍也不消二十分鐘。
中午時份,正值是附近勞工階層的用膳時間,我們四人要搭檯,全店九成以上是工友,大都點了碟頭飯,今天的特別推介是番茄紅衫魚飯或薯仔炆雞飯,送例湯,都是 $27,來這裏當然想試其招牌菜,但鴨腳包與金錢雞已訂滿,而太爺雞也給店方推說需時未能供應,想必因午巿人多繁忙,不想為一味菜而拖跨廚房,唯有改點其他。
選了五款點心,叉燒包,珍珠雞,牛肉球,鮮蝦魚翅餃和馬拉糕,又點了午巿迷你粉麵和小食,鍋貼石斑夾和山楂咕嚕肉,福建飯。午巿看不見吃點心的客人,我們成了稀有異類,可能是即叫即蒸,所有點心都要等上十多分鐘,叉燒包皮厚肉少,而鮮蝦魚翅餃是沒有蝦的,還有餡料是一堆釀魚肉而已,味道不好,而牛肉球,珍珠雞則不過不失,馬拉糕夠大件,亦見鬆軟,鍋貼石斑夾一碟有三件,實則是魚多士,看紋理和味道不似是石斑肉,較似一塊「龍利」魚柳放在麵包上炸至金黃,醮點酸甜汁也不錯,而山楂咕嚕肉是最有水準的一味,肉精瘦,粉漿薄,外殼咬落香脆,汁醬甜酸有度,不可多得,迷你福建飯也炒得不錯,有肉粒冬菇粒菜粒等,汁茨調較得宜。
今次在午巿未能吃到其精萃,要改天在晚上再次光臨,並先預訂部份食品,想在這間四十多年的老店搵餐飯食,殊不容易也!
評分: 味道 4 環境 2 服務 2 衛生 2 抵食 5
1個
共有3 人投票
查看結果
numbaseventeen
共7篇食評
特色 ‧ 傳統
鴨腳包
佛跳牆 - 超鮮甜! 一碗絕對"唔夠喉"!!
鴨腳包 - 好特別, 但味道只屬一般..
古法金錢雞 - 看到一大片肥膏, 有點怕, 不是怕肥, 是怕羶.. 但怎麼也得一試.. 咦? OK喎!! 雖然會有點油膩, 不過幾種材料的味道非常配合!!
砵酒焗桶蠔 - 超級愛蠔 or 蠔豉! 這個菜, 愛蠔人仕絕對會愛不釋手, 蠔味濃郁豐富!
蝦籽柚皮 - 很棒!! 超軟綿, 很入味, 加上蝦籽"釣釣"味, 好!
雞蛋焗魚腸 - 不太會欣賞, 有腥味但不難吃, 就是這樣
古法太爺雞 - 聽說正式讀法為古法太"YEAH"雞, 聽到都開心的名字. 非常煙燻, 味道特別, 未試過可以試, 但我不"愛"它
桂花糕 - 最適合不過的甜品, 好用來平衡一下整晚各"濃味小菜", 清淡香甜, 極飽也可以撑多一件~
整體質數高, 只略嫌太濃&有點油膩, 但款式特別, 不容易找到, 值得和大夥朋友多試幾款菜啊!
評分: 味道 4 環境 3 服務 2 衛生 2 抵食 3
2個
查看結果
pandamen
共336篇食評
心願達成
幾位的答案都是:得龍!自此一直銘記心中.於是期間一直不動聲色、靜待機會!
其實自己有手有脚當然懂得去揾食,但想有一班志同道合者一同去共享的話,唯有等待飯局.
(心態就像球迷入場睇波一樣!成班人一齋去做一件事,特別高興!)
自己相信進食的氣氛絕影響對食物的感覺,一大班人在期待飯局的開始,心情最興奮!
一個2xx磅嘅人要保持體重不再上升(唔好妄想下跌),要比一個正常人來得辛苦多倍!對雞皮、內臟、肥膏早已訓練得毫無慾望(即是不會特意去叫).所以此晚之菜色絕對是妖邪之物!
古法金錢雞----明明看見一大片半透明的肥膏,一大件乾硬的膶!加多舊柴皮义燒,但叠在一起放入口中,卻有極奇妙的化學作用!甜甜的蜜汁加上脂肪在口內溶化後與起沙的膶混合,再加上須點時間咀嚼的义燒,感覺就似小朋友吃過第一口雪糕後,追著想吃第二啖!
鹵水雞雜----雞膶的口感夠粉,腎亦都爽脆!雞腸帶點肥膏本應不錯,可惜太索汁!令到味道過咸.
懷舊金錢鱔----只知做法極繁複,第一口的感覺有點像吃扎蹄,一樣是有馬蹄粒及豬肉粒,可惜始終是魚類!放涼了的味道總是差一點!
大良野雞卷----不知是不是個別情况?一連幾件也是一咬即爆油!就像整件也吸滿油一樣!口內只得很重的南乳味.
煎法國香腸----好像是臨時加入拼盤內的食品!意外之物,不懂形容!
雲南野菌湯----看見撈出來的材料,己知此湯一定有返咁上下!入口有非常濃厚的菌味,欣賞吊味用的金華火腿份量下得極準確!提供了鹹味但不蓋過其它的味道.
花蛤----真不知煮法是什麼?面有蒜蓉有葱,底部有些"汁"味道有點像烚完意粉的水…不過材料新鮮是事實!花蛤味鮮,體形飽滿肥美,生熟程度控制得好,保持到肉質嫩滑!
古法太爺燻雞----又要再次破戒之魔鬼!煙燻的味道不只入肉,連骨頭的表面也沾有茶香!雞皮燻至表面有點乾身,內裡的黃油卻仍在,雞肉嫩滑程度如吃法國春雞一樣!
得龍脆咕嚕肉----天然山渣的酸味和普通的糖醋聞起來是差不多,但入口的分別就頗大!前者入口後喉嚨不感涸乾,而且慢慢感到有點甜味,排骨沒有太多肥膏,粉漿開得不錯,咬落仍有脆口的感覺!
麒麟蝦籽柚皮----芥蘭剪掉大部份葉後排在碟上,賣相有點萬聖節Feel!茨汁的味道太濃及偏咸,吃不出柚皮的味道,而且金華火腿切得太厚,吃得一口是渣!
魚湯浸黃帝菜----一向喜歡味道較為濃烈的菜,如蓎嵩及這款黃帝菜更是火煱必備!魚湯味道頗濃,沒腥味!
家鄉芋頭炆鵝----有點失望!芋頭切得太大件,有部份未炆得淋,而鵝肉味道是不錯但卻有很多件的肉質韌到咬不開!不過這個汁的味道及腩肉真是出色!
芝士蟹肉燴麵----聽聞本來是訂了荷葉飯,但老闆極力推介這新口味包好食的產品!
極濃味的中式芝士汁煮法加上蟹肉及烏冬,出來的效果又幾持別,用伊麵的話並不意外,但竟然是用烏冬!質感彈牙好味得來有創意!
糯米麥粥、桂花糕----兩者都甜度適中,雖然是贈品但絕不馬虎!
完成一個心願後總有點失落!要開始尋找另一個目標.
評分: 味道 5 環境 3 服務 3 衛生 3 抵食 4
3個
共有1 人投票
查看結果
SP Wu
共33篇食評
8大 3小 的意見
古法太爺雞
鴨腳包
金錢雞
放在一旁的肥膏
海皇什菜煲
已一早預定咗此店招牌菜…….鴨腳包 & 金錢雞
當晚某些 “老朋友” 因事缺席
所以只有8大 3小出席,!!!
不知為什麼 “小” 的意見還多過 “大” 的… @@
跟着我們還點了六碟餸, 共八碟餸就好滿足咁填包咗我哋!!
期望太高的餸菜 – 反而失分
鴨腳包 = 其實大家都唔知有嘜涵在內, 好似食到雞肝、叉燒, 味道似乎係一般!!
只是咬下去的口感唔錯!!
金錢雞 = 蜜汁鋪面 - 視覺很好, 最頂的是薑、鵝肝 / 鳳肝 (食唔出係嘜) 及
义燒夾著肥膏...材料係好肥膩….太高膽固醇...
亦不是我們一向的favour, 可免則免!!!
全部肥膏只是放在一旁, “小” 的都是欣賞D义燒!!!
古法太爺雞 = 半隻 - 聼說用多種材類來煙薰的太爺雞, 但賣相似豉油雞,
味道沒什麼特別, 肉質係嫩….但不及清遠雞!!!
“懷舊” 呢個感覺原來我哋食唔出
可能我們還是 “年輕” 吧!!!
沒期望的餸菜 – 評價很高
海皇什菜煲 = 鮮魷 + 鱼材料 + 什菜 = 味道淡了點
此道菜令人吃得一般!!
香蒜籠仔糯米蝦 = 糯米飯 + 鮮蝦, 其實蝦是很細隻,
但可能糯米飯吸了蝦鮮味; 所以吃起來是香口!!
糯米飯亦軟硬適中, 蝦味不濃但鮮!!
蝦乾啫啫唐生菜 = 蝦乾+唐生菜 = 其中一個 “老朋友” 覺得有點咸但好野味
跟着大家都好有共鳴!!! 一個平平無奇的賣相, 但令我們食出個滋味!!!
山楂咕嚕肉 = D粉 / 外皮很薄, 所以更能炸得出外皮鬆脆肉質內軟的質感
酸得OK la,山楂味我又食唔出wor!
“小” 的都紛紛主動說……好味呀!!! & 我鍾意呢碟餸啊!!!
其中一個 “小” 的還說: 我鍾意食D菠蘿!!!
雞蛋焗魚腸 = 這道菜我第一次係响東莞食, 先知魚腸係 “可以食”重好好食!!
其中一個 “老朋友” 係 “食家”, 齋講食果種 “食家”
佢話講滋味係內陸勝一籌
不過講材料就 內陸係蛋多過魚腸, 但依家係魚腸多過其他….
第二次食呢樣餸的我, 只可以話 good job!!!
其實無人話有魚腸係涵, 我根本唔知係魚腸!!!
D “小” 的唔敢食….咁又係…以前我都唔食, 以為會有腥味!!!
甜品 = 係送 = 桂花糕 & 紅豆沙, 我無食但佢哋話唔錯
HK$1,000 留下…OK la!!!
備註: 千奇唔好俾D相內 “叻叻” 唔導, D “小” 的話呢d係相反表現
反之有尾指的才是美味呀!!! @@
評分: 味道 4 環境 3 服務 3 衛生 3 抵食 3
0個
共有2 人投票
查看結果
Babedolphin
共429篇食評
無星勝有星 - A Superlative Michelin Omission
鴨腳包 & 鵝翼
失傳古法太爺雞
金錢雞 - oh my god. this is awesome
山楂咕嚕肉
台山焗蟹缽
蝦籽柚皮
Sometimes I genuinely feel that us locals should not 'reject' the inaugural HK Michelin publication so much, afterall, it has barely had the benefit of less than a year since its publication. Should it has it fair share of errors and disagreements with what might recommend otherwise. On the other hand? My biggest fear is that due to some egotistical reasons or what other excuses, that certain local shops with really high quality executions of traditionaly Cantonese food might escape their attention for the 2nd time around, if they refuse to listen to the ordinary folks. Although I shall also stress that - those of us who are adamant that 'foreigners' wouldn't be able to understand Chinese food perfectly, would only make us seem like ostriches pointing their behinds upwards toward the sky all day long. I have certainly seen numerous 'foreign food critics' whose knowledge of Chinese and also Cantonese food to be so profound and accurate, it surprised me that they even understood the chinese words meanings and nuaces and how its cooked. Let's not kid ourselves and think our Chinese souls are 刀槍不入 and allow a shameful history to repeat itself in the process. As much as we might understand French or British food, let's not assume that's wouldn't be the case vice versa.
9.5/10 金錢雞 -
If the Manor's version is the modernised healthy version, I think the Tak Lung's version can only be described as an 'Idealized' version, according to the wish of the chef and owner. From my memory bank, 金錢雞 in the past did not taste like this at all. It used to carry a lot more livery taste, the fat was chewy and yellow, the pork portion was ultra lean. The version here is slightly modernised but its just divine. The fatty layer might not carry as much rose wine scent as the Manor version, but it made up for it with its much more sophisticated malty-glaze and sauce.
8.5/10 台山焗蟹缽 -
Although 奄仔蟹 isn't considered a delicacy as such and is normally used in cheap congees or hotpots, I thought the porcelain baked crab dish here was just amazingly executed. The crabs' organs from roes to the greenish tomalley was melted right onto the baked egg dish in an oily way. The combination of taro bits as well as chinese black olives (欖角) really accentuated the dish to another level in terms of sophistication, the olives especially having an aroma that reminds me of a meaty summer truffle.
6.5/10 雞蛋焗魚腸 -
Due to the standard set by the previous dish and with me being the agent provocateur, we ordered this as a follow-up and had high expectations. I must say we were slightly disappointed, as this is nowhere near the best versions of the same dish I've had in the past and certainly can't compare to the West Villa version I encountered not so long ago. Here, it actually carries a bit of salty pork and what seemed like Westernised smoked ham rather than Yunnan ham. It mainly lacked the fish liver's oily taste which gives it the profound aroma, and the fish intestines were too thoroughly cleaned and soaked to give it any real character.
With the use of Cilantro stalks rather than also using more of the leafy parts of the same plant, it carried more of an aniseed flavour but lacked the aroma that could be possible if the leaves were imparted into the baked dish. Yes, this dish smells nice and eggy, but it was a bit soul-less without the main theme ingredient protruding and showing through beyond its mere presence. It might as well be as a filler - which this dish also doesn't have any chinese crullers. Left a lot to be desired and I don't recommend this.
8.0/10 失傳古法太爺雞 -
This is known to be a rare dish with an ancient recipe that has been lost through the years. It actually uses 龍崗雞, a highly treasured Cantonese chicken known for its chicken flavour but with a leaner and slightly tougher meat despite its large physical size. Smoked with aged pur erh, rice grains and cane sugar, I thought the chicken itself was cooked perfectly and it was quite tender without being artificially so. The chicken taste was detectable but it got a bit covered by the smoked-sugar. In fact, the cane sugar influence also covered the non-existent chinese tea smoke which I came to expect. Fortunately, this came with a very adequate shallots based sauce which surprisingly, complemented the chicken very well. I liked this but I guess I though the skin was too sweet in a sense.
8.0/10 山楂咕嚕肉 -
This is the famed southern Cantonese interpretation of the same dish also served in Northern China (which uses darker soy and vinegar based sauce) and adorns every table within sight this night, some people even opting for an upsized portion. This was quite nice indeed, the Hawthorn Sauce was definitely the real deal as its jammy and my nose could not pick up any vinegar whatsoever, which I'm highly allergic to as it makes my eyes water if I happen to smell it.
The batter was slightly too thick in my opinion but it served to retain its crunchiness even after the addition of the sauce, which 'hung' onto the bite sized meats and now I finally understand why this part is raved about, as its probably quite difficult to achieve consistently. I actually thought, truth be told, that the sauce could do with a stronger Hawthorn berry flavour - as it is now, it was a bit confectionery especially when it also carried a bit of cane sugar taste in the background. I liked how this came with fresh pineapples, green capsicums as well as bit of Hawthorn jellies on the side. This is very good indeed, although I do remember having better in Canton/Guangzhou a few times.
7.5/10 鴨腳包 -
This consists of taro, duck feet (bone-in), taro, lard and bbq char siu, tied around itself with a long piece of duck intesting. Apparently, this duck intestine must be 1 singular stringy piece or else the whole thing would collapse when it shrinks under cooking. I've actually never had this before but when I asked my parents, they said that they used to buy this all the time, sometimes even carried it into cinemas like it duck gizzards or pop-corn.
It was 'interesting', and the execution was actually quite good. I'm just thinking if this could have benefitted more if it used duck meat rather than pork, to stick with its core theme.
7.0/10 蝦籽柚皮 -
This polarised the table but we found out why. 1 piece of the pomelo skin (now nearly in season or close enough!) was much more tastier than the other thicker piece, because it managed to soak up more juice. To me, I've always loved this dish since a kid despite not having it for many years and I think there can be 2 approaches to how to cook this dish. One is when a lot of fish stock is used to poach the 'skins' and it infiltrates deeply into the fibres. The other is when the original citrusy taste can remain slightly intact, provided the bitterness is eliminated. I thought that the version here lied somewhere in between. The stock it was cooked in was slightly single dimensional, although the shrimp roe sauce made up with its unique umami taste. I also think the texture of the skins was slightly too soft..... The version I had at Manor was at least 2 notches above the version here though.
8.8/10 紅豆沙 -
This carried a fresher fruit zest flavour other than the older, aged zest influence. It was good as it is, as it was refreshening. It even managed to have a slightly gritty texture that dessert soup lovers desire, with perfectly cooked lotus seeds that were half way between crunchy and soft.
9.5/10 桂花糕 - I really liked this. It carried a lot of Osmanthus flower taste without the associated sourness, also the ripe goji berries gave it just that extra dimension. Perhaps what really surprised me is how the jelly base itself also carried a strong fruity flavour and it wasn't overly 'hard' like many other places, the osmanthus flower buds within also being quite aromatic. I went to Lung King Heen again right after this meal and the 'jelly' here surprisingly puts that into oblivion, but that's another story and review when I get around to it!
**********************************
Although this meal certainly was not flawless, I would also like to point out that not one single or multiple Michelin starred restaurant I have visited locally didn't suffer the same fate. It was highly satisfying in so many ways and I think it carried a lot of sophistication than it should - one could envisage that a lot of effort was actually put in to certain dishes this night, which gave it just that much more of an extra dimension that one could bargain for for the ridiculously affordable prices.
This is a gem of Hong Kong for certain and if I was a tourist from up north or from a Western country and relied solely on the 2009 1st edition of the HK Michelin Redbook, I would certainly have missed one very satisfying dining experience.
Some foods = '4-5'
Some foods = '3'
But in general, I think its edging enough close to a '5' or a very high '4'
評分: 味道 5 環境 3 服務 4 衛生 3 抵食 5
8個
共有4 人投票
查看結果
小勁健
共213篇食評
外父食魚腸
「鴨腳包」
「二人份量佛跳牆」
「蒜蓉蝦蒸糯米飯」
「雞蛋焗魚腸」
「山渣咕嚕肉」
「砵酒焗桶蠔」
「海皇什菜煲」
「蝦乾啫啫唐生菜」
由於兩餐之間相距的時間太近,本來不打算寫食評,但今晚其中兩道菜色實在太精彩,不得不寫出來舒發一下美味之情。
在八款的食物中有多款已是翻兜再翻兜之選,翻兜的包括佛跳牆($188.00)、鴨腳包($45.00)、山渣咕嚕肉($78.00)及蝦乾啫啫唐生菜($59.00),各款菜色仍舊保持水準,十分出色,故此不再作詳述。
其餘四款的舊雨新知,包括舊雨的砵酒焗桶蠔($168.00)、蒜蓉蝦蒸糯米飯($88.00)、雞蛋焗魚腸($70.00),及新知的海皇什菜煲($69.00)。
砵酒焗桶蠔雖是自己的"飛佛",但這是一款要待人多時才可點的菜色,因為一罐桶蠔約有五至八隻不等,視乎每隻的大小而定。今晚這碟剛巧只有五隻,比例上分配不平均,有超大的亦有超細的,但一家人吃飯倒沒所謂,就由外母大人品嚐最大的一隻,外父隨後,再來的是我,較細的兩隻由啤梨兩姊妹來分。
砵酒味濃郁,外層焗得香脆,蠔的汁液及鮮味完全收藏在裡面,一啖咬下去時,汁液一湧而出,鮮味頓時充滿口腔,蔥粒及生菜來用中和一下濃郁感,真是久違了的美味。
蒜蓉蝦蒸糯米飯又是一道人多才能點的食物,蝦雖不算十分新鮮味美,但在蒜蓉的帶動下仍然吃得津津有味,糯米飯軟硬適中,細碎的臘味粒平均地分配其中,吸收了蝦的味道,再加上點點蔥香,每一口也是香口軟綿。
雞蛋焗魚腸這道菜已有一段時間沒有吃,還記得上次在此吃的那一砵,實在有點失手,魚腸帶苦澀,其後便漸漸遺忘了。今晚外父首次到此,啤梨知道他喜歡吃魚腸,於是便點下此菜,那刻心中確實有點憂慮。
送上來時表層仍然脹卜卜,在旁伴著一瓶吃魚腸必備的胡椒粉,魚腸在新鮮滾熱辣下腥味也會輕點,有了上次的陰影,於是馬上夾了一件,灑了一點胡椒粉,便放入口中。
實在有點出乎意料之外,一點魚腥味也沒有,反而帶著濃濃的蛋香及淡淡的魚腸味,除此之外,內裡還有粉絲、冬菇粒及火腿粒,但就刪除了十分有代表性的油炸鬼,話雖如此,亦無損其美味及精彩度。看見外父大人不停手地添了又添,便可知道他對此菜的評價是如何地高。
海皇什菜煲的材料算是豐富,亦十分新鮮,蝦球及鮮魷十分彈牙,魚塊亦是新鮮貨,什菜不是菜頭菜尾貨色,味道清淡得來帶著味海鮮味道,此菜雖不會帶給你震撼感,但是一道令人吃得舒服的一道菜。
各款新知舊雨也可獨當一面,翻兜菜色全是水準之作,相互配合起上令到這頓晚餐吃得大家也十分滿意,最後的甜品兩味水準也沒變,只是桂花糕甜了少許。離開時看見外父大人一家吃得開心又滿意,令我亦感到十分安慰。
評分: 味道 4 環境 3 服務 4 衛生 3 抵食 3
2個
共有8 人投票
查看結果
肥趙
共47篇食評
幾好、不過唔係咁底食
冬瓜盅 2 個 $ 336
山渣咕嚕肉 $78
粟米石班塊 $78
蝦乾生啫唐生菜 $ 62
啫啫芥蘭 $ 60
蒜頭豆豉炒蕃薯苗 $ 49
椒鹽茄子盒 $ 60
金蒜蟹蒸糯米飯 $ 98
豉椒炒肉眼筋 $ 69
白飯 8 碗 $ 80
汽水 $ 88
酸菜 $ 48
茶介 $ 96
桂花糕 (送)
無加一,共 $ 1202
評分: 味道 3 環境 3 服務 3 衛生 3 抵食 3
0個
共有2 人投票
查看結果