Higher cost is not higher quality !
The natural sustenance industry was evaluated at $29 billion in 2010, and from that point forward, it's developed by just about 10% a year; that is by all accounts something to be thankful for. That is to say, who doesn't need more advantageous nourishment that is better for the earth? Be that as it may, how about we take a gander at the financial aspects. In March, a Consumer Reports investigation found that, by and large, natural nourishment is 47% more costly than consistent sustenance. The USDA numbers are comparable. Obviously, natural nourishment is more costly to make than normal sustenance, yet a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences observed that it's lone 5-7% more costly, so the value contrast is not so much advocated; it additionally implies that natural cultivating has turned out to be more gainful than standard cultivating. As such, from a value perspective, natural has turned into an equivalent word for extravagance.
Natural sustenance is the quickest developing part of the American nourishment industry, and its cost is just too high. Be that as it may, hello, it ought to be beneficial for you, isn't that so?
Natural nourishment and your wellbeing
Spoiler alarm: there is next to no logical confirmation to bolster any medical advantages for natural items. Truth be told, there is developing proof that an eating regimen rich in natural items isn't very for you.
"There's a clear absence of proof," says scientist Crystal Smith-Spangler at Stanford University School of Medicine, particularly with regards to investigations of individuals.
A 2009 meta-examination (an investigation of different studies) said there was no supplement distinction in natural versus customary. Yet, that was one of the principal real studies concentrating on natural sustenance – from that point forward, we've had increasingly analysts dissecting the circumstance… yet they thought of comparative results. A recent report discovered somewhat higher phosphorous levels in the natural produce, and a recent report discovered higher cell reinforcement levels and lower cadmium levels in natural sustenance. Those are great things, however the distinctions weren't dynamite, and positively don't legitimize the value contrast.
In 2012, another monstrous meta-investigation was distributed. A Stanford group investigated 240 studies: 17 contrasting populaces expending natural and ordinary eating methodologies, and 223 studies that analyzed either the supplement levels or the bacterial, contagious or pesticide defilement of different items (natural products, vegetables, grains, meats, milk, poultry, and eggs) become naturally and ordinarily. They report minimal critical contrast in medical advantages amongst natural and ordinary nourishments, and additionally no reliable contrasts in the vitamin substance of natural items. Truth be told, one and only supplement (once more, phosphorous) was altogether higher in natural versus traditionally developed produce. Protein and fat substance were likewise comparative, despite the fact that a critical distinction was accounted for in natural milk, which contained more elevated amounts of omega-3 unsaturated fats.
店名叫 Gym Box，究竟為什麼跟 Gym 有關呢？ 好奇走入店子探過究竟，順便看看 menu！ 
精心設計的餐單，食物卻是缺乏選擇性！ 別出心裁以高蛋白質的食物為主！ 
在店內進食期間，見到不少大隻男來幫襯，可見這類型飯盒有一定吸引力呢！ 
魚柳、藜麥、粟米 $68
雞胸、糙米、粟米 $68
Gym tea $10
Gym Bar $30
期待店方推出更多食品， 由於食物偏少較單一化，現時卻不敵附近的 Supafood！ 勝在早前的 Online delivery lunch box service 可儲了一班舊客！ 
