| 28/F, QRE Plaza, 202 Queen's Road East, Wan Chai 灣仔皇后大道東202號QRE Plaza 28樓 | |
| Japanese | Sushi/Sashimi |
| 28 vs11 vs12![]() |
| 28/F, QRE Plaza, 202 Queen's Road East, Wan Chai 灣仔皇后大道東202號QRE Plaza 28樓 | |
| Japanese | Sushi/Sashimi |
| 28 vs11 vs12![]() |
Finally got the chance to give this restaurant a try. As soon as we got in, we were greeted by their friendly waitresses. We requested for seats in the booth area and were immediately led to a spacious booth. The staffs seemed quite attentive throughout the dinner. The quality of their sashimi were quite fresh but the most memorable dish of the night must be their hamachi and toro. The toro is extremely light pink in colour and extremely tender. Too bad toro is only taken from bluefin tuna so it is quite a luxurious and tasty delicacy. Their hamachi is also worth mentioning. Inevitably sad, I find hamachi is often overlooked. Although their hamachi is not as rich as the toro, it is still very good; with a buttery and smoky flavor. Overall their sushi selections were plentiful and the sashimi were fresh. The dining experience was quite pleasant and I would recommend it to others.
Table Wait Time: 0 minute(s)
Date of Visit: Jul 15, 2012 Spending per head: Approximately HKD500(Dinner) Other Ratings: Taste 5 | Environment 4 | Service 5 | Hygiene 4 | Value for Money 3
Recommend 0 |
I bought a Groupon deal for two to enjoy a 10-course set dinner and ate at the restaurant with my boyfriend. The surroundings of the restaurant are clean and modern, but the tables are placed very close together. Not that it was a problem since we knew this wasn't a fine dining restaurant. The waiters and waitresses were very attentive and efficient. As we were waiting for our food, we noticed that the bigger tables would be quite nice for group gatherings. The first course to come was the organic tomato salad. As my boyfriend observed, it was served very cold. Refreshing and delicious. The second course was Japanese beans. I've never been a fan of these, and I was not swayed this time either. The third course, hand-rolled onion toro, was one of the highlights of the meal. The seaweed was crisp, the onion toro tasted great and there was a mound of wasabi for me to enjoy it with. The fourth course was the sea urchin sashimi. The previous times I tried sea urchin, I disliked it. However, I enjoyed the sea urchin sashimi served at Habitat. Perhaps I'm acquiring a taste for it. The fifth course was a hotpot with Norwegian wild salmon head. The meat on the fish tasted pretty good, and there was nothing wrong with the hotpot. It just didn't really strike us as Japanese. With the spicy cabbage making up the bulk of the hotpot, it really seemed more like Korean kimchi hotpot. The sixth course, Japanese-style seafood fried rice, was alright. I liked the fact that it wasn't greasy, but by then, I was getting full so I didn't finish it. The seventh course was fresh burdock miso soup, which tasted okay. The eighth course was spicy Japanese cheese tonikokoman. Very similar to okonomiyaki, which I don't like at all. But the tonikokoman wasn't drenched in sauce the way okonomiyaki tends to be, and it was a pleasant surprise. The cheese tasted especially good. The ninth course, grilled minced chicken skewer, was another highlight. Being a fan of chicken cartilage, I enjoyed the chewy bits in the skewer immensely. We didn't eat the tenth course, ice cream, as we were full after nine courses. Would I go back to Habitat? I'd definitely consider it if I'm in the neighbourhood. Recommended Dish(es):
organic tomato salad,hand-rolled onion toro,spicy Japanese cheese tonikokoman,grilled minced chicken skewer Table Wait Time: 0 minute(s)
Date of Visit: Oct 15, 2011 Spending per head: Approximately HKD149.50(Dinner) Other Ratings: Taste 5 | Environment 5 | Service 5 | Hygiene 5 | Value for Money 5
Recommend 0 |
I've been wanting to try this place out for a long time and maybe it's my bad luck, but every time I call, it's full. I was very excited when I called and they had a table available for us. When I got there, no need to wait, there were quite a few tables available.
Date of Visit: Sep 15, 2011 Other Ratings: Taste 3 | Environment 4 | Service 3 | Hygiene 4 | Value for Money 3
Recommend 0 |
I wonder if it was a chain reaction that, the groupon meals I had always failed badly. A month ago, I was tempted by this groupon dinner called 融會東瀛珍味:以 $299 享受柊亭料理<柊之二人套餐>,十道菜包括海膽刺身、Toro手卷 (原價 $868) at the Habitat Japanese Restaurant. I bought it straight away and decided to try it out with C.
Due to the unfavourable lighting of the restaurant, C was not able to capture all the photos of the dishes. Therefore I shall pay special attention to the dishes without the photos, in order to effectively comment on them in words.
免治雞肉棒
海鮮炒飯
By the time we once again felt disappointed just by feeling the ROCK-ALIKE ice cream, C and I were so COLD (because of the air conditioning) and DISAPPOINTED that we did not even bother finishing the icecream, but to pay the bill and left immediately. Never would I return to Habitat again. It made me wonder could they survive any longer even by the strategy of promoting groupons with such standard of food and setting? I'm sorry but in no reasons could I persuade myself to like this restaurant.. - Y Date of Visit: Aug 15, 2011 Spending per head: Approximately HKD150(Dinner) Other Ratings: Taste 2 | Environment 2 | Service 3 | Hygiene 2 | Value for Money 1
Recommend 0 |
The reviews of this restaurant were pretty good, which led us to get a coupon we found for the restaurant - it was HKD300 for a "10"-course meal for 2 people. I understand the impetus for using the coupon to publicize your business, but if you are going to do it, do it right. I think the entire meal + service + experience was a solid 4/10. Food: Not good generally. Tomato salad - standard. Edamame - standard. Tuna hand roll - this was pretty good (the best thing of the night). Uni plate - I knew it would be bad, it was bad. Tasted like victoria harbor. Seafood fried rice - soggy. Kimchee sukiyaki fish soup thing - never had this in Japanese food before, don't even know what it was. "Okonomiyaki" - tasted like plastic not sure where they got their recipe. Kushiyaki - chicken + cartilage, was about 90% cartilage, like chewing knuckles. Miso soup - came with a half a bowl, not great. Mango ice cream - ok.... After the meal, looked at the menu to see how these items were described - don't think I saw any of them on there. Service: Udnerstandbly they were getting a lot of customers at this time who were using the coupon. Good for them. They did not handle it well. Impossible to make my reservation - tried saying the coupon codes - took like 20 minutes. I don't know how better to communicate a string of letters and numbers, but it was not fun. They only had two seating times - 6:30 and 8 - should have told us before we bought. They shuttled us in like cattle, food came in shotgun bursts one after another - no time to digest, no greeting, no time to enjoy (not that there was much to enjoy anyway). We asked at the very start if we could substitute the Uni because we knew it would not be good (given the price point we thought we could get anything instead of that and it would be okay) - but they were adamant you could not change the set. They did not tell us why. Basically, the whole meal was like a fancy sit-down setting for a box dinner you get from 7-11. I've had better tasting bento boxes from 7-11 in japan though, sadly. One very nice plus, though, was that the sushi chef (we were sitting at the bar), after seeing us ask about the Uni several times, and after seeing us eating only a fraction of each dish, offered to give us a plate of salmon sashimi! Very very nice of him, we didn't want him to get in trouble though so we declined it. Bottomline: Pros: nice sushi chef, tuna hand roll was good, probably menu items are also equally good, ambiance Cons (all related to the coupon): food + service Would have much rather preferred a more expensive coupon deal, or something simpler, fewer 'courses', and a taste of the actual menu, if they wanted me to come back. Table Wait Time: 0 minute(s)
Date of Visit: Jul 26, 2011 Other Ratings: Taste 1 | Environment 4 | Service 1 | Hygiene 4 | Value for Money 1
Recommend 0 |